Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827088›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024

Compulsory Indications in Hospital Prescribing Software Tested with Antibacterial Prescriptions.

Lorna Pairman, Paul Chin, Sharon J Gardiner, Matthew Doogue

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorna PairmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Paul ChinDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Sharon J GardinerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Matthew DoogueDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to assess how making the indication field compulsory in our electronic prescribing system influenced free text documentation and to visualise prescriber behaviour. The indication field was made compulsory for seven antibacterial medicines. Text recorded in the indication field was manually classified as 'indication present', 'other text', 'rubbish text', or 'blank'. The proportion of prescriptions with an indication was compared for four weeks before and after the intervention. Indication provision increased from 10.6% to 72.4% (p<0.01) post-intervention. 'Other text' increased from 7.6% to 25.1% (p<0.01), and 'rubbish text' from 0.0% to 0.6% (p<0.01). Introducing the compulsory indication field increased indication documentation substantially with only a small increase in 'rubbish text'. An interactive report was developed using a live data extract to illustrate indication provision for all medicines prescribed at our tertiary hospital. The interactive report was validated and locally published to support audit and quality improvement projects.

Identifiers

PMID38827088
PMCPMC11141823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.