ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024
Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Exercise Exertion Levels Using Wearable Physiological Data.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sparse frame selection for graph-based deadlift form assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Home Automated Telemanagement System for Individualized Exercise Programs: Design and Usability Evaluation.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Exercise Interventions in the Management of Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using physiological data from wearable devices, the study aimed to predict exercise exertion levels by building deep learning classification and regression models. Physiological data were obtained using an unobtrusive chest-worn ECG sensor and portable pulse oximeter from healthy individuals who performed 16-minute cycling exercise sessions. During each session, real-time ECG, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and revolutions per minute (RPM) data were collected at three intensity levels. Subjects' ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected once per minute. Each 16-minute exercise session was divided into eight 2-minute windows. The self-reported RPEs, heart rate, RPMs, and oxygen saturation levels were averaged for each window to form the predictive features. In addition, heart rate variability (HRV) features were extracted from the ECG for each window. Different feature selection algorithms were used to choose top-ranked predictors. The best predictors were then used to train and test deep learning models for regression and classification analysis. Our results showed the highest accuracy and F1 score of 98.2% and 98%, respectively in training the models. For testing the models, the highest accuracy and F1 score were 80%.
Identifiers
38827087PMC11141804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.