ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024
Linking Cancer Clinical Trials to their Result Publications.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The results of clinical trials are a valuable source of evidence for researchers, policy makers, and healthcare professionals. However, online trial registries do not always contain links to the publications that report on their results, instead requiring a time-consuming manual search. Here, we explored the application of pre-trained transformer-based language models to automatically identify result-reporting publications of cancer clinical trials by computing dense vectors and performing semantic search. Models were fine-tuned on text data from trial registry fields and article metadata using a contrastive learning approach. The best performing model was PubMedBERT, which achieved a mean average precision of 0.592 and ranked 70.3% of a trial's publications in the top 5 results when tested on the holdout test trials. Our results suggest that semantic search using embeddings from transformer models may be an effective approach to the task of linking trials to their publications.
Identifiers
38827077PMC11141816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.