ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024
Pragmatic De-Identification of Cross-Domain Unstructured Documents: A Utility-Preserving Approach with Relation Extraction Filtering.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The volume of information, and in particular personal information, generated each day is increasing at a staggering rate. The ability to leverage such information depends greatly on being able to satisfy the many compliance and privacy regulations that are appearing all over the world. We present READI, a utility preserving framework for the unstructured document de-identification. READI leverages Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction technology to improve the quality of the entity detection, thus improving the overall quality of the data de-identification process. In this proof of concept study, we evaluate the proposed approach on two different datasets and compare with the existing state-of-the-art approaches. We show that Relation Extraction-based Approach for De-Identification (READI) notably reduces the number of false positives and improves the utility of the de-identified text.
Identifiers
38827069PMC11141830What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.