ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024
Assessing the Barriers and Facilitators to Pulmonary Rehabilitation Referrals Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodule Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration Pipeline for Large Language Model-Assisted Thematic Analysis Across Digital Health Interview Studies: Comparative Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Hybrid deep learning and YAMNet features for asthma diagnosis from respiratory sounds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a global health issue causing significant illness and death. Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) offers non-pharmacological treatment, including education, exercise, and psychological support which was shown to improve clinical outcomes. In both stable COPD and after an acute exacerbation, PR has been demonstrated to increase exercise capacity, decrease dyspnea, and enhance quality of life. Despite these benefits, referrals for PR for COPD treatment remain low. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of healthcare providers for referring a COPD patient to PR. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with pulmonary specialists, hospitalists, and emergency department physicians. Domains and constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were applied to the qualitative data to organize, analyze, and identify the barriers and facilitators to referring COPD patients. The findings from this study will help guide strategies to improve the referral process for PR.
Identifiers
38827066PMC11141829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.