Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827046›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2024

Detecting Cerebral Ischemia From Electroencephalography During Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning.

Amir I Mina, Jessi U Espino, Allison M Bradley, Parthasarathy D Thirumala, Kayhan Batmanghelich, Shyam Visweswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amir I MinaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jessi U EspinoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Allison M BradleyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Parthasarathy D ThirumalaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kayhan BatmanghelichDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Shyam VisweswaranDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
The internship in Biomedical Research, Informatics, and Computer Science (iBRIC): Biomedical Informatics and Data Science research experiences for students from Minority Serving InstitutionsT15LM007059 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER · 1987 to 2026
$23.9M
TRAINING PROGRAM FOR MD/PHD STUDENTST32GM008208 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEINMAN, RICHARD A · 1987 to 2021
$15.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008208NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring cerebral neuronal activity via electroencephalography (EEG) during surgery can detect ischemia, a precursor to stroke. However, current neurophysiologist-based monitoring is prone to error. In this study, we evaluated machine learning (ML) for efficient and accurate ischemia detection. We trained supervised ML models on a dataset of 802 patients with intraoperative ischemia labels and evaluated them on an independent validation dataset of 30 patients with refined labels from five neurophysiologists. Our results show moderate-to-substantial agreement between neurophysiologists, with Cohen's kappa values between 0.59 and 0.74. Neurophysiologist performance ranged from 58-93% for sensitivity and 83-96% for specificity, while ML models demonstrated comparable ranges of 63-89% and 85-96%. Random Forest (RF), LightGBM (LGBM), and XGBoost RF achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values of 0.92-0.93 and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) values of 0.79-0.83. ML has the potential to improve intraoperative monitoring, enhancing patient safety and reducing costs.

Identifiers

PMID38827046
PMCPMC11141851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.