ReviewCureus2024
Radiological Findings in Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catecholamine-Induced Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: An Overlooked Cause of Thunderclap Headache.Cureus · 2025Article
- Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome-related headache and delayed cerebral infarction: a mini review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) poses a complex neurological challenge characterized by sudden, severe headaches and multifocal cerebral vasoconstriction. While our understanding of its clinical aspects and underlying mechanisms has advanced, the focus of investigation remains on radiological manifestations. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze the existing literature on radiological findings in RCVS, synthesizing evidence from diverse imaging modalities to enhance the understanding of imaging features associated with the syndrome. Accurate diagnosis based on radiological findings is pivotal for initiating appropriate management and preventing complications. Specific markers may facilitate the differentiation of RCVS from other conditions, thereby enhancing patient care. This review explores a wide range of radiological presentations, from vasoconstriction to infarctions and hemorrhages, thereby refining diagnostic criteria and guiding clinical practice. By consolidating current knowledge, the review sheds light on areas of consensus, controversies, and gaps, with the aim of serving as a comprehensive resource for evidence-based decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.