Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38827000›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Importance of Digital Rectal Examination in Identifying Early-Onset Rectal Malignancies.

Anshul Ramanathan, Benjamin Smith

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anshul RamanathanMedicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, USA.
Benjamin SmithSurgery, LewisGale Medical Center, Blacksburg, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Rectal cancers, specifically, are the second most common cancer of the large intestine. Although once perceived as a disease of the elderly, the incidence of early-onset CRC (EO-CRC), classified as occurring in individuals less than 50 years old, has been paradoxically increasing. Although the incidence of rectal cancers has increased, the digital rectal exam (DRE) continues to be an underutilized physical exam maneuver when a patient presents with red-flag symptoms. Here, we present a case of a 38-year-old male from West Virginia who was referred to general surgery for complaints of rectal bleeding attributed to internal hemorrhoids. After undergoing a colonoscopy, the patient was found to have a rectal mass consistent with adenocarcinoma. We describe the importance of identifying red-flag signs to keep colorectal malignancy in the differential diagnosis in a young patient and highlight the importance of performing rectal exams to identify rectal cancers early to expedite treatment.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdiagnostic colonoscopyinternal hemorrhoidsper-rectal bleedingpost-grad medical educationrectal examscreening colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38827000
PMCPMC11140421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.