ArticleCureus2024
Feeding Issues in Infants Referred for Frenotomy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe diagnosis of ankyloglossia has increased significantly around the world over the last decade. Frenotomy is indicated in infants with ankyloglossia to improve breastfeeding, although there is little scientific evidence of its efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether infants being referred for frenotomy had feeding issues prior to the procedure.
methodsA retrospective chart review was undertaken for all infants under one year of age referred with ankyloglossia to a pediatric otolaryngology practice or a pediatric hospital between 2018 and 2020. Data included age at referral, gender, comorbidities, feeding issues, whether ankyloglossia was diagnosed, and whether frenotomy was done. Frequencies and non-parametric comparisons were calculated.
resultsOf the 646 consultations made for tongue tie, a diagnosis of ankyloglossia was made in 94.7% (N=612) of the patients based on clinical judgment. The most common feeding complaints were poor latch (57.1%, N=369) and painful latch (50.3%, N=325). Eighty one (12.5%) patients did not have a reported feeding difficulty. Most patients had an anterior tongue tie (85.8%, N=554), with some showing signs of restricted tongue movement (30.1%, N=184). Ankyloglossia was 4.03 times more likely to be diagnosed (p<.001) and frenotomy was 1.76 times more likely to be performed (p<.001) in the hospital setting compared to the clinic setting. Conclusion: Children under the age of one referred to otolaryngology for ankyloglossia were often diagnosed concordantly, although some lacked feeding issues that would indicate frenotomy. There are still knowledge gaps about infantile ankyloglossia in referring medical personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.