ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2024
A leadless pacemaker implantation for a patient with systemic right ventricle under ventricular assist device support.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) often develop complete atrioventricular block and heart failure due to the abnormal disposition of atrioventricular node and disadvantage of systemic right ventricle. These issues are managed with a pacing system and a ventricular assist device (VAD), respectively. While technological advances offer new treatment strategies, the simultaneous deployment of a leadless pacemaker and a VAD in cases of ccTGA remains unexplored. Here, we present a case of leadless pacemaker implantation for a VAD-supported ccTGA patient. The safety of a leadless pacemaker for a subpulmonary left ventricle and electromagnetic interference between devices are major concerns when implanting a leadless pacemaker; however, the current case overcomes these obstacles. There were no perioperative complications, and both devices were functioning without problems during a one-year follow up. We expect that, even in patients with cardiac complexity such as systemic right ventricle under VAD support, a leadless pacemaker could become the treatment of choice if the indication is appropriate, although careful and close follow up is needed. Learning objective: Technological advances expand treatment strategies and provide significant benefits to patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). However, discussion of the combination of a leadless pacemaker and a ventricular assist device (VAD) is rare. We demonstrated the efficacy of a leadless pacemaker for a subpulmonary left ventricle in a patient with systemic right ventricle on VAD. This approach could be an option even for ACHD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.