ArticleHeliyon2024
Deep learning model integrating radiologic and clinical data to predict mortality after ischemic stroke.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Poststroke Mortality Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Most prognostic indexes for ischemic stroke mortality lack radiologic information. We aimed to create and validate a deep learning-based mortality prediction model using brain diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and clinical factors. Methods: Data from patients with ischemic stroke who admitted to tertiary hospital during acute periods from 2013 to 2019 were collected and split into training (n = 1109), validation (n = 437), and internal test (n = 654). Data from patients from secondary cardiovascular center was used for external test set (n = 507). The algorithm for predicting mortality, based on DWI and ADC (DLP_DWI), was initially trained. Subsequently, important clinical factors were integrated into this model to create the integrated model (DLP_INTG). The performance of DLP_DWI and DLP_INTG was evaluated by using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (TD AUCs) and Harrell concordance index (C-index) at one-year mortality. Results: The TD AUC of DLP_DWI was 0.643 in internal test set, and 0.785 in the external dataset. DLP_INTG had a higher performance at predicting one-year mortality than premise score in internal dataset (TD- AUC: 0.859 vs. 0.746; p = 0.046), and in external dataset (TD- AUC: 0.876 vs. 0.808; p = 0.007). DLP_DWI and DLP_INTG exhibited strong discrimination for the high-risk group for one-year mortality. Interpretation: A deep learning model using brain DWI, ADC and the clinical factors was capable of predicting mortality in patients with ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.