Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826726›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Performance evaluation of E-VGG19 model: Enhancing real-time skin cancer detection and classification.

Irfan Ali Kandhro, Selvakumar Manickam, Kanwal Fatima, Mueen Uddin, Urooj Malik, Anum Naz, Abdulhalim Dandoush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irfan Ali KandhroDepartment of Computer Science, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, 74000, Pakistan.
Selvakumar ManickamNational Advanced IPv6 Centre (NAv6), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Kanwal FatimaDepartment of Computer Science, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, 74000, Pakistan.
Mueen UddinCollege of Computing and Information Technology, University of Doha For Science & Technology, 24449, Doha, Qatar.
Urooj MalikDepartment of Computer Science, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, 74000, Pakistan.
Anum NazDepartment of Computer Science, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, 74000, Pakistan.
Abdulhalim DandoushCollege of Computing and Information Technology, University of Doha For Science & Technology, 24449, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is a pervasive and potentially life-threatening disease. Early detection plays a crucial role in improving patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) techniques, particularly when combined with pre-trained deep learning models, have shown promise in enhancing the accuracy of skin cancer detection. In this paper, we enhanced the VGG19 pre-trained model with max pooling and dense layer for the prediction of skin cancer. Moreover, we also explored the pre-trained models such as Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG19), Residual Network 152 version 2 (ResNet152v2), Inception-Residual Network version 2 (InceptionResNetV2), Dense Convolutional Network 201 (DenseNet201), Residual Network 50 (ResNet50), Inception version 3 (InceptionV3), For training, skin lesions dataset is used with malignant and benign cases. The models extract features and divide skin lesions into two categories: malignant and benign. The features are then fed into machine learning methods, including Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), our results demonstrate that combining E-VGG19 model with traditional classifiers significantly improves the overall classification accuracy for skin cancer detection and classification. Moreover, we have also compared the performance of baseline classifiers and pre-trained models with metrics (recall, F1 score, precision, sensitivity, and accuracy). The experiment results provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of various models and classifiers for accurate and efficient skin cancer detection. This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to create automated technologies for detecting skin cancer that can help healthcare professionals and individuals identify potential skin cancer cases at an early stage, ultimately leading to more timely and effective treatments.

Indexed as

Health careImage segmentationMachine learning and deep learningPre-trained modelsSkin cancer detection

Identifiers

PMID38826726
PMCPMC11141372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.