ArticleHeliyon2024
Performance evaluation of E-VGG19 model: Enhancing real-time skin cancer detection and classification.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable deep learning for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy diagnosis: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence with deep learning driven entropy-curvature attention mechanism for detection and segmentation of skin lesions using biomedical images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Water hyacinth detection for autonomous navigation mapping using image segmentation cascaded classifier.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of quantization on various CNN architectures for bone fracture detection.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- Explainable depth-wise and channel-wise fusion models for multi-class skin lesion classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- HMDF-Net: a transfer learning-based heterogeneous multimodal dynamic fusion network for depression detection among inmates in correctional facilities.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Advancing skin cancer diagnosis with deep learning and attention mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-stage knowledge distillation with layer fusion-based deep learning approach for skin cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced skin cancer classification using modified efficientNetV2L with adaptive early stopping mechanism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced early skin cancer detection through fusion of vision transformer and CNN features using hybrid attention of EViT-Dens169.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for dermatological conditions: a systematic review focused on low- and middle-income countries to address resource constraints and improve access to specialist care.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- SkinEHDLF a hybrid deep learning approach for accurate skin cancer classification in complex systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lung cancer detection with machine learning classifiers with multi-attribute decision-making system and deep learning model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Skin Lesion Classification Through Test Time Augmentation and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Optimized Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm enabled DETR (DEtection TRansformer) model for skin disease classification.PloS one · 2025Article
- Dual-stage segmentation and classification framework for skin lesion analysis using deep neural network.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is a pervasive and potentially life-threatening disease. Early detection plays a crucial role in improving patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) techniques, particularly when combined with pre-trained deep learning models, have shown promise in enhancing the accuracy of skin cancer detection. In this paper, we enhanced the VGG19 pre-trained model with max pooling and dense layer for the prediction of skin cancer. Moreover, we also explored the pre-trained models such as Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG19), Residual Network 152 version 2 (ResNet152v2), Inception-Residual Network version 2 (InceptionResNetV2), Dense Convolutional Network 201 (DenseNet201), Residual Network 50 (ResNet50), Inception version 3 (InceptionV3), For training, skin lesions dataset is used with malignant and benign cases. The models extract features and divide skin lesions into two categories: malignant and benign. The features are then fed into machine learning methods, including Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), our results demonstrate that combining E-VGG19 model with traditional classifiers significantly improves the overall classification accuracy for skin cancer detection and classification. Moreover, we have also compared the performance of baseline classifiers and pre-trained models with metrics (recall, F1 score, precision, sensitivity, and accuracy). The experiment results provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of various models and classifiers for accurate and efficient skin cancer detection. This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to create automated technologies for detecting skin cancer that can help healthcare professionals and individuals identify potential skin cancer cases at an early stage, ultimately leading to more timely and effective treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.