Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826716›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Sweet potato (

Zakaria Alam, Sanjida Akter, Md Anwar Hossain Khan, Md Iqbal Hossain, Md Nurul Amin, Avijit Biswas, Ebna Habib Md Shofiur Rahaman, Mir Aszad Ali, Debashish Chanda, Md Hasan Sofiur Rahman and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Zakaria AlamBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Sanjida AkterBangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Md Anwar Hossain KhanBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Md Iqbal HossainBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Md Nurul AminBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Avijit BiswasBangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Ebna Habib Md Shofiur RahamanInternational Potato Centre (CIP), Bangladesh Office, Dhaka, 1230, Bangladesh.
Mir Aszad AliInternational Potato Centre (CIP), Bangladesh Office, Dhaka, 1230, Bangladesh.
Debashish ChandaInternational Potato Centre (CIP), Bangladesh Office, Dhaka, 1230, Bangladesh.
Md Hasan Sofiur RahmanBangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh.
Md Abu KawocharBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Md Shamshul AlamBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Mainuddin MollaBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Md Monirul IslamBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
M A H S JahanBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Md Zulfikar Haider ProdhanBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Md Monjurul KadirBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
Debasish SarkerBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Bangladesh, sweet potato holds the fourth position as a crucial carbohydrate source, trailing rice, wheat, and potato. However, locally grown sweet potato varieties often display limited stability and yield. To tackle this challenge, diverse selection methods and statistical models were utilized to pinpoint sweet potato genotypes showcasing both stability and superior yield and quality traits. In the initial two years, multiple selection methods were employed to narrow down the collections based on preferences for yield and its contributing traits. Subsequently, a multi-environment trial (MET) was conducted in the following year to pinpoint superior and stable genotypes with desirable yield and quality characteristics. An integrated approach involving the Multi-Trait Genotype Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI), Factor Analysis and Ideotype-Design (FAI-BLUP), and Smith-Hazel Index (SH) led to the identification of 71 superior sweet potato genotypes out of a total of 351 in the initial growing season. In the subsequent season, the MGIDI selection index was applied to the 71 genotypes, resulting in the selection of 11 top-performing genotypes. This selection process was complemented by a detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the selected genotypes. In the MET, the mixed effect model, specifically the linear mixed model (LMM), identified significant genotypic and genotype-environment interaction (GEI) variances. This points to elevated heritability and selection accuracy, ultimately boosting the model's reliability. By combining the strengths of LMM and additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI), the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) index identified H20 as the top-performing genotype for marketable root yield (MRY), H37 for dry weight of root (DW), H8 for beta carotene (BC) and H41 for vitamin c (VC). These genotypes surpassed the overall average in the WAAS index. For simultaneous stability and high performance, the WAASBY index selected H37 for MRY, H6 for DW, H61 for BC, and H3 for VC. Finally, genotypes H3 and H20 were selected using multi-trait stability index (MTSI), as they possessed high performance and stability. Based on the selection sense, the objective has been achieved with regards to the trait MRW, which serves as a major criterion for a superior variety of sweet potato.

Indexed as

FAI-BLUPMGIDIMTSIStabilitySweet potato selectionWAAS

Identifiers

PMID38826716
PMCPMC11141454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.