ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Frequency-domain analysis of membrane polarization in two-compartment model neurons with weak alternating electric fields.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Extracellular Resistance on Neuronal Sensitivity Under Weak Alternating Electric Field Stimulation: A Computational Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-scale model of neural entrainment by transcranial alternating current stimulation in realistic cortical anatomy.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on Spike train correlation in two-compartment model neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- A linearized modeling framework for the frequency selectivity in neurons postsynaptic to vibration receptors.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is widely used in studying brain functions and the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases in a frequency-specific manner. However, how tACS works on neuronal activity has been poorly understood. In this paper, we use linear system analysis to investigate how weak alternating electric fields (EFs) affect the membrane polarization of neurons in the frequency domain. Two biophysically realistic conductance-based two-compartment models of cortical pyramidal neurons are developed to simulate subthreshold membrane polarization with weak alternating EFs. We linearize the original nonlinear models at the stable equilibrium points and further simplify them to the two- or three-dimensional linear systems. Thus, we calculate the transfer functions of the low-dimensional linear models to model neuronal polarization patterns. Based on the transfer functions, we compute the amplitude- and phase-frequency characteristics to describe the relationship between weak EFs and membrane polarization. We also computed the parameters (gain, zeros, and poles) and structures (the number of zeros and poles) of transfer functions to reveal how neuronal intrinsic properties affect the parameters and structure of transfer functions and thus the frequency-dependent membrane polarization with alternating EFs. We find that the amplitude and phase of membrane polarization both strongly depended on EF frequency, and these frequency responses are modulated by the intrinsic properties of neurons. The compartment geometry, internal coupling conductance, and ionic currents (except
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.