ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Modification of temporal pattern sensitivity for inputs from medial entorhinal cortex by lateral inputs in hippocampal granule cells.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The medial dendrites (MDs) of granule cells (GCs) receive spatial information through the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) from the entorhinal cortex in the rat hippocampus while the distal dendrites (DDs) of GCs receive non-spatial information (sensory inputs) through the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC). However, it is unclear how information processing through the two pathways is managed in GCs. In this study, we investigated associative information processing between two independent inputs to MDs and DDs. First, in physiological experiments, to compare response characteristics between MDs and DDs, electrical stimuli comprising five pulses were applied to the MPP or LPP in rat hippocampal slices. These stimuli transiently decreased the excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) of successive input pulses to MDs, whereas EPSPs to DDs showed sustained responses. Next, in computational experiments using a local network model obtained by fitting of the physiological experimental data, we compared associative information processing between DDs and MDs. The results showed that the temporal pattern sensitivity for burst inputs to MDs depended on the frequency of the random pulse inputs applied to DDs. On the other hand, with lateral inhibition to GCs from interneurons, the temporal pattern sensitivity for burst inputs to MDs was enhanced or tuned up according to the frequency of the random pulse inputs to the other cells. Thus, our results suggest that the temporal pattern sensitivity of spatial information depends on the non-spatial inputs to GCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.