Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826654›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Classification of coma/brain-death EEG dataset based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network.

Boning Li, Jianting Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Boning LiGraduate School of Engineering, Saitama Institute of Technology, Fusaiji 1690, Fukaya, Saitama 3690293 Japan.
Jianting Cao *Graduate School of Engineering, Saitama Institute of Technology, Fusaiji 1690, Fukaya, Saitama 3690293 Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) evaluation is an important step in the clinical diagnosis of brain death during the standard clinical procedure. The processing of the brain-death EEG signals acquisition always carried out in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The electromagnetic environmental noise and prescribed sedative may erroneously suggest cerebral electrical activity, thus effecting the presentation of EEG signals. In order to accurately and efficiently assist physicians in making correct judgments, this paper presents a band-pass filter and threshold rejection-based EEG signal pre-processing method and an EEG-based coma/brain-death classification system associated with One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN) model to classify informative brain activity features from real-world recorded clinical EEG data. The experimental result shows that our method is well performed in classify the coma patients and brain-death patients with the classification accuracy of 99.71%, F1-score of 99.71% and recall score of 99.51%, which means the proposed model is well performed in the coma/brain-death EEG signals classification task. This paper provides a more straightforward and effective method for pre-processing and classifying EEG signals from coma/brain-death patients, and demonstrates the validity and reliability of the method. Considering the specificity of the condition and the complexity of the EEG acquisition environment, it presents an effective method for pre-processing real-time EEG signals in clinical diagnoses and aiding the physicians in their diagnosis, with significant implications for the choice of signal pre-processing methods in the construction of practical brain-death identification systems.

Indexed as

Brain-deathComaElectroencephalographyMachine learningNeural networkSignal pre-processing

Identifiers

PMID38826654
PMCPMC11143104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.