ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Effect in the spectra of eigenvalues and dynamics of RNNs trained with excitatory-inhibitory constraint.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-Parametrized dynamics: Representation of time and decisions in recurrent neural networks.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Task-Parametrized Dynamics: Representation of Time and Decisions in Recurrent Neural Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Exploring Flip Flop memories and beyond: training Recurrent Neural Networks with key insights.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to comprehend and enhance models that describes various brain regions it is important to study the dynamics of trained recurrent neural networks. Including Dale's law in such models usually presents several challenges. However, this is an important aspect that allows computational models to better capture the characteristics of the brain. Here we present a framework to train networks using such constraint. Then we have used it to train them in simple decision making tasks. We characterized the eigenvalue distributions of the recurrent weight matrices of such networks. Interestingly, we discovered that the non-dominant eigenvalues of the recurrent weight matrix are distributed in a circle with a radius less than 1 for those whose initial condition before training was random normal and in a ring for those whose initial condition was random orthogonal. In both cases, the radius does not depend on the fraction of excitatory and inhibitory units nor the size of the network. Diminution of the radius, compared to networks trained without the constraint, has implications on the activity and dynamics that we discussed here. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-023-09956-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.