Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826564›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

AlbuCatcher for Long-Acting Therapeutics.

Ji Hyun Rho, Jae Hun Lee, Inchan Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji Hyun RhoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hun LeeSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea.
Inchan KwonSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0806-4116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic proteins, pivotal for treating diverse human diseases due to their biocompatibility and high selectivity, often face challenges such as rapid serum clearance, enzymatic degradation, and immune responses. To address these issues and enable prolonged therapeutic efficacy, techniques to extend the serum half-life of therapeutic proteins are crucial. The AlbuCatcher, a conjugate of human serum albumin (HSA) and SpyCatcher, was proposed as a general technique to extend the serum half-life of diverse therapeutic proteins. HSA, the most abundant blood protein, exhibits a long intrinsic half-life through Fc receptor (FcRn)-mediated recycling. The SpyTag/SpyCatcher (ST/SC) system, known for forming irreversible isopeptide bonds, was employed to conjugate HSA and therapeutic proteins. Site-specific HSA conjugation to SC was achieved using an inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) reaction, minimizing activity loss. Using urate oxidase (Uox) as a model protein with a short half-life, the small ST was fused to generate Uox-ST. Then, HSA-conjugated Uox (Uox-HSA) was successfully prepared via the Uox-ST/AlbuCatcher reaction. In vitro enzyme assays demonstrated that the impact of ST fusion and HSA conjugation on Uox enzymatic activity is negligible. Pharmacokinetics studies in mice revealed that Uox-HSA exhibits a significantly longer serum half-life (about 18 h) compared to Uox-WT (about 2 h). This extended half-life is attributed to FcRn-mediated recycling of HSA-conjugated Uox, demonstrating the effectiveness of the AlbuCatcher strategy in enhancing the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins.

Identifiers

PMID38826564
PMCPMC11137731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.