ArticleACS omega2024
Visualization and Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domain of Fluid Flow Related to Microfluidic Chip.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfluidic chips are important tools to study the microscopic flow of fluid. To better understand the research clues and development trends related to microfluidic chips, a bibliometric analysis of microfluidic chips was conducted based on 1115 paper records retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace and VOSviewer software were used to analyze the distribution of annual paper quantity, country/region distribution, subject distribution, institution distribution, major source journals distribution, highly cited papers, coauthor cooperation relationship, research knowledge domain, research focuses, and research frontiers, and a knowledge domain map was drawn. The results show that the number of papers published on microfluidic chips increased from 2010 to 2023, among which China, the United States, Iran, Canada, and Japan were the most active countries in this field. The United States was the most influential country. Nanoscience, energy, and chemical industry and multidisciplinary materials science were the main fields of microfluidic chip research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.