Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826512›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic communities2021

Resident interactions when affirming and correcting peers in a therapeutic community for women.

Keith Leverett Warren, Nathan Doogan, Uwe Wernekinck, Fiona Claire Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic communities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keith Leverett WarrenCollege of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Nathan DooganCollege of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Ohio Colleges of Medicine Government Resources Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Uwe WernekinckCollege of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Fiona Claire DohertyCollege of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Development of a statistical framework for the analysis of social network predictors of therapeutic community outcomesR34DA043079 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, KEITH LEVERETT · 2018 to 2020
$690k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA043079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose –: While recent years have seen a number of studies of social networks in therapeutic communities (TCs) and other residential settings, these have primarily focused on male residents. This paper aims to conduct a longitudinal social network analysis of interpersonal interactions in a TC for women. Design/methodology/approach –: The data consists of a longitudinal directed social network of instances of feedback between 56 residents of a 16 bed TC for women over a period of 611 days. Mean age of the participants was 33.1 years, mean length of stay was 133.9 days and 91% of the participants were female. Feedback consisted of written affirmations for prosocial behavior and written corrections for contravening TC norms. Data was analyzed using a latent factor longitudinal social network model. Findings –: Residents react to peer intervention in complex ways. Residents reciprocated affirmations (B = 0.14, 95% confidence interval = 0.10, 0.18) and corrections (B = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.13, 0.25). Controlling for reciprocity, participants who received affirmations were more likely to affirm and correct peers (B = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.15; B = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.10, 0.23), suggesting that the encouragement offered by affirmations leads to increased activity. Homophily by admission time occurred in both affirmations and corrections (B = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.10, 0.37; B = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.29, 0.74). Originality/value –: While affirmations and corrections serve as vehicles for behavioral reinforcement and social learning, they also allow residents to interact in ways that strengthen social bonds.

Indexed as

PrisonsSocial network analysisSubstance dependenceTC practiceTherapeutic communities

Identifiers

PMID38826512
PMCPMC11142629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.