Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826498›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024

Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score predicts hepatic decompensation and mortality.

Madeline Pearson, Jennifer Nobes, Iain Macpherson, Lucy Gold, Michael Miller, Ellie Dow, John F Dillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test, FIB-4 and FibroScan: Real-World Prognostic Accuracy for MASLD in a Biopsy-Controlled Cohort.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic Value of the TLM3 Biomarker Panel for Early Fibrosis Development in MASLD Within the General Population.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Preventing the progression of cirrhosis to decompensation and death.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madeline PearsonSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Jennifer NobesDepartment of Blood Sciences, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Iain MacphersonGut Group, Division of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Lucy GoldSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Michael MillerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Ellie DowDepartment of Blood Sciences, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
John F DillonGut Group, Division of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: In community pathways for detection of liver disease the most common reason for referral is fibrosis assessment. We investigated the impact of adding the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score as a second-line test (subsequent to an indeterminate or high Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4] and/or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score) to guide referral and prognostication in our multi-aetiology pathway. Methods: Patients with ELF results from the intelligent Liver Function Testing (iLFT) pathway were recruited. Case note review was undertaken to compare ELF with endpoints of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and mortality (liver-related and all-cause death). Results: In total, 1,327 individuals were included with a median follow-up of 859 days and median ELF score of 10.2. Overall sensitivity for cirrhosis at the 9.8 threshold was 94% (100% for metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, 89% for alcohol-related liver disease). Determination of the ELF score as a second-line test reduced the referral rate by 34%. ELF scores predicted hepatic outcomes; each unit change was associated with increased decompensation (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 2.215, 95% CI: 1.934-2.537) and liver-related mortality (aHR 2.024, 95% CI: 1.674-2.446). ELF outperformed FIB-4 for risk of liver-related mortality, particularly in the short-term (area under the curve [AUC] 94.3% Conclusions: The addition of ELF reduced the number of individuals referred for fibrosis assessment following iLFT pathway testing and provided useful prognostic information. Individuals with ELF scores ≥13 were considered at high-risk of negative outcomes warranting urgent clinical assessment. Impact and implications: Primary care pathways for suspected liver disease are increasingly common and often lead to increased specialist hepatology referrals for fibrosis assessment. This study, using clinical follow-up for liver-related outcomes, provides further evidence supporting ELF testing to safely reduce referrals in a two-step approach when combined with other simple fibrosis markers. Additionally, ELF scores predict liver-related morbidity and mortality, with ELF scores ≥13 indicating particularly high-risk patients. This study may help inform the implementation of diagnostic pathways for early detection of liver disease and highlights the need for urgent review of individuals with very high ELF scores.

Indexed as

Enhanced Liver Fibrosis testingLiver fibrosisMulti-aetiologyNon-invasive testsPrognosticationReferral pathwayStratification

Identifiers

PMID38826498
PMCPMC11141136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.