Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826487›Full record

ReviewWellcome open research2022

Conceptualising and assessing health system resilience to shocks: a cross-disciplinary view.

Sharif A Ismail, Sadie Bell, Zaid Chalabi, Fouad M Fouad, Reinhard Mechler, Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel, Karl Blanchet, Josephine Borghi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sharif A IsmailDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-7337
Sadie BellDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Zaid ChalabiInstitute for Environmental Design and Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Fouad M FouadFaculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-4058
Reinhard MechlerAdvanced Systems Analysis Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, A-2361, Austria.
Andrada Tomoaia-CotiselRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, 90401-3208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-6298
Karl BlanchetGeneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-8020
Josephine BorghiDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health systems worldwide face major challenges in anticipating, planning for and responding to shocks from infectious disease epidemics, armed conflict, climatic and other crises. Although the literature on health system resilience has grown substantially in recent years, major uncertainties remain concerning approaches to resilience conceptualisation and measurement. This narrative review revisits literatures from a range of fields outside health to identify lessons relevant to health systems. Four key insights emerge. Firstly, shocks can only be understood by clarifying how, where and over what timescale they interact with a system of interest, and the dynamic effects they produce within it. Shock effects are contingent on historical path-dependencies, and on the presence of factors or system pathways (e.g. financing models, health workforce capabilities or supply chain designs) that may amplify or dampen impact in unexpected ways. Secondly, shocks often produce cascading effects across multiple scales, whereas the focus of much of the health resilience literature has been on macro-level, national systems. In reality, health systems bring together interconnected sub-systems across sectors and geographies, with different components, behaviours and sometimes even objectives - all influencing how a system responds to a shock. Thirdly, transformability is an integral feature of resilient social systems: cross-scale interactions help explain how systems can show both resilience and transformational capability at the same time. We illustrate these first three findings by extending the socioecological concept of adaptive cycles in social systems to health, using the example of maternal and child health service delivery. Finally, we argue that dynamic modelling approaches, under-utilised in research on health system resilience to date, have significant promise for identification of shock-moderating or shock-amplifying pathways, for understanding effects at multiple levels and ultimately for building resilience.

Indexed as

adaptationHealth systemresilienceshocktransformation

Identifiers

PMID38826487
PMCPMC11140310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.