ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
A hierarchy of processing complexity and timescales for natural sounds in human auditory cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient behavior is supported by humans' ability to rapidly recognize acoustically distinct sounds as members of a common category. Within auditory cortex, there are critical unanswered questions regarding the organization and dynamics of sound categorization. Here, we performed intracerebral recordings in the context of epilepsy surgery as 20 patient-participants listened to natural sounds. We built encoding models to predict neural responses using features of these sounds extracted from different layers within a sound-categorization deep neural network (DNN). This approach yielded highly accurate models of neural responses throughout auditory cortex. The complexity of a cortical site's representation (measured by the depth of the DNN layer that produced the best model) was closely related to its anatomical location, with shallow, middle, and deep layers of the DNN associated with core (primary auditory cortex), lateral belt, and parabelt regions, respectively. Smoothly varying gradients of representational complexity also existed within these regions, with complexity increasing along a posteromedial-to-anterolateral direction in core and lateral belt, and along posterior-to-anterior and dorsal-to-ventral dimensions in parabelt. When we estimated the time window over which each recording site integrates information, we found shorter integration windows in core relative to lateral belt and parabelt. Lastly, we found a relationship between the length of the integration window and the complexity of information processing within core (but not lateral belt or parabelt). These findings suggest hierarchies of timescales and processing complexity, and their interrelationship, represent a functional organizational principle of the auditory stream that underlies our perception of complex, abstract auditory information.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.