Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826160›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Harnessing open science practices to teach ecology and evolutionary biology using interactive tutorials.

Jory E Griffith, Elizabeth Houghton, Margaret A Slein, Maxime Fraser Franco, Jhoan Chávez, Amy B Forsythe, Victoria M Glynn, Egor Katkov, Kirsten M Palmier, Zihaohan Sang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jory E GriffithDepartment of Biology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6020-6690
Elizabeth HoughtonDepartment of Biology University of British Columbia (Okanagan) Kelowna British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1229-7617
Margaret A SleinDepartment of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-5404
Maxime Fraser FrancoDépartement des Sciences Biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8513
Jhoan ChávezDepartment of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences University of Northern British Columbia Prince George British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-9060
Amy B ForsytheDepartment of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-4997
Victoria M GlynnRedpath Museum and Department of Biology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-5002
Egor KatkovDepartment of Biology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-7367
Kirsten M PalmierDepartment of Biology University of Regina Regina Saskatchewan Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9984-6468
Zihaohan SangDepartment of Computer Science University of Toronto (St. George) Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4149-7271
Rolando Trejo-PérezInstitut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale Université de Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3671-3056
Bryn WileyDepartment of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6124-9911
Jennifer M SundayDepartment of Biology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9372-040X
Joey R BernhardtDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-2801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open science skills are increasingly important for a career in ecology and evolutionary biology (EEB) as efforts to make data and analyses publicly available continue to become more commonplace. While learning core concepts in EEB, students are also expected to gain skills in conducting open science to prepare for future careers. Core open science skills like programming, data sharing, and practices that promote reproducibility can be taught to undergraduate students alongside core concepts in EEB. Yet, these skills are not always taught in biology undergraduate programs, and a major challenge in developing open science skills and learning EEB concepts simultaneously is the high cognitive load associated with learning multiple disparate concepts at the same time. One solution is to provide students with easily digestible, scaffolded, pre-formatted code in the form of vignettes and interactive tutorials. Here, we present six open source teaching tutorials for undergraduate students in EEB. These tutorials teach fundamental ecological concepts, data literacy, programming (using

Indexed as

cognitive load theoryeducational resourcesonline tutorialsopen scienceR programmingstudent‐centered learningteachingundergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID38826160
PMCPMC11139548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.