Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826155›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Daily Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Postoperative Endometrial and Cervical Cancer With PTV Margin Reduction to 5 mm: Dosimetric Outcomes, Acute Toxicity, and First Clinical Experience.

Guangyu Wang, Zhiqun Wang, Yu Zhang, Xiansong Sun, Yuliang Sun, Yuping Guo, Zheng Zeng, Bing Zhou, Ke Hu, Jie Qiu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Guangyu WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhiqun WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiansong SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuliang SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuping GuoTumor Hospital affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Zheng ZengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Bing ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ke HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jie QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junfang YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the first clinical implementation of daily iterative cone beam computed tomography (iCBCT)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) in the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. Methods and Materials: Seventeen consecutive patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study, with a reduced uniform 3-dimensional PTV margin of 5 mm. Treatment plans were designed to deliver 45 or 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions to PTV. Pre- and posttreatment ultrasound and iCBCT scans were performed to record intrafractional bladder and rectal volume changes. The accuracy of contouring, oART procedure time, dosimetric outcomes, and acute toxicity were evaluated. Results: The average time from first iCBCT acquisition to completion of treatment was 22 minutes and 26 seconds. During this period, bladder volume increased by 44 cm Conclusions: Daily oART was associated with favorable dosimetry improvement and low acute toxicity, supporting its safety and efficacy for postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective randomized controlled cohort.

Identifiers

PMID38826155
PMCPMC11140188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.