Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826043›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2024

Perspectives on competency-based feedback for training non-specialists to deliver psychological interventions: multi-site qualitative study of the EQUIP competency-based approach.

Abdelrhman Elnasseh, Varun S Mehta, Gergana Manolova, Gloria A Pedersen, Shannon Golden, Liyam Eloul, Frezgi Gebrekristos, Pamela Y Collins, Teresia Mutavi, Anne W Mbwayo and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Abdelrhman ElnassehCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4646-1756
Varun S MehtaCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, USA.
Gergana ManolovaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Gloria A PedersenCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3427-3464
Shannon GoldenThe Center for Victims of Torture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Liyam EloulThe Center for Victims of Torture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Frezgi GebrekristosThe Center for Victims of Torture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Pamela Y CollinsJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3956-448X
Teresia MutaviDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Anne W MbwayoDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Muthoni MathaiDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1480-5833
Tessa ConcepcionDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2180-3534
Rozane El MasriResearch and Development Department, War Child, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9243-6431
Frederik SteenResearch and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-3184
Jerome T GaleaSchool of Social Work, University of South Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-6959
Carmen ContrerasSocios En Salud, San Isidro, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-3819
Josephine AkellotHealthRight International, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8114-3957
Rosco KasujjaDepartment of Mental Health, Makerere University, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-5123
Samuel WaserekaHealthRight International, Kampala, Uganda.
Byamah Brian MutambaButabika Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-443X
Wietse A TolSection of Global Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-0526
Mansurat RajiCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6701-5053
Sacha MoufarrejCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, USA.
Alison SchaferDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-8607
Brandon A KohrtCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3829-4820

Funding

United States Agency for International DevelopmentWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of feedback to address gaps and reinforce skills is a key component of successful competency-based mental health and psychosocial support intervention training approaches. Competency-based feedback during training and supervision for personnel delivering psychological interventions is vital for safe and effective care.

aimsFor non-specialists trained in low-resource settings, there is a lack of standardised feedback systems. This study explores perspectives on competency-based feedback, using structured role-plays that are featured on the Ensuring Quality in Psychosocial and Mental Health Care (EQUIP) platform developed by the World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund.

methodQualitative data were collected from supervisors, trainers and trainees from multiple EQUIP training sites (Ethiopia, Kenya, Lebanon, Peru and Uganda), from 18 key informant interviews and five focus group discussions (

resultsFour main themes demonstrated how a competency-based structure enhanced the feedback process: (a) competency-based feedback was personalised and goal-specific, (b) competency-based feedback supported a feedback loop, (c) competency-based feedback supported a comfortable and objective feedback environment, and (d) competency-based feedback created greater opportunities for flexibility in training and supervision.

conclusionsA better understanding of the role of feedback supports the implementation of competency-based training that is systematic and effective for trainers and supervisors, which ultimately benefits the learning process for trainees.

Indexed as

Education and traininglow- and middle-income countriespsychosocial interventionsqualitative researchtranscultural psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID38826043
PMCPMC11363075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.