Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38825836›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Perceptions and Utilization of Online Peer Support Among Informal Dementia Caregivers: Survey Study.

Zhijun Yin, Lauren Stratton, Qingyuan Song, Congning Ni, Lijun Song, Patricia Commiskey, Qingxia Chen, Monica Moreno, Sam Fazio, Bradley Malin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social media use and positive aspects of caregiving: a longitudinal test of the social compensation hypothesis.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhijun YinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3075-1337
Lauren StrattonPsychosocial Research and Program Evaluation, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-8749
Qingyuan SongDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2999-8690
Congning NiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6950-6948
Lijun SongDepartment of Sociology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3162-2649
Patricia CommiskeyDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6376-4698
Qingxia ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-1847
Monica MorenoCare and Support, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-6759-3475
Sam FazioQuality Care and Psychosocial Research, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5408-4241
Bradley MalinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-5175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Informal dementia caregivers are those who care for a person living with dementia and do not receive payment (eg, family members, friends, or other unpaid caregivers). These informal caregivers are subject to substantial mental, physical, and financial burdens. Online communities enable these caregivers to exchange caregiving strategies and communicate experiences with other caregivers whom they generally do not know in real life. Research has demonstrated the benefits of peer support in online communities, but this research is limited, focusing merely on caregivers who are already online community users. Objective: We aimed to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support through a survey. Methods: Following the Andersen and Newman Framework of Health Services Utilization and using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), we designed and administered a survey to investigate the perceptions and utilization of online peer support among informal dementia caregivers. Specifically, we collected types of information that influence whether an informal dementia caregiver accesses online peer support: predisposing factors, which refer to the sociocultural characteristics of caregivers, relationships between caregivers and people living with dementia, and belief in the value of online peer support; enabling factors, which refer to the logistic aspects of accessing online peer support (eg, eHealth literacy and access to high-speed internet); and need factors, which are the most immediate causes of seeking online peer support. We also collected data on caregivers' experiences with accessing online communities. We distributed the survey link on November 14, 2022, within two online locations: the Alzheimer's Association website (as an advertisement) and ALZConnected (an online community organized by the Alzheimer's Association). We collected all responses on February 23, 2023, and conducted a regression analysis to identifyn factors that were associated with accessing online peer support. Results: We collected responses from 172 dementia caregivers. Of these participants, 140 (81.4%) completed the entire survey. These caregivers were aged 19 to 87 (mean 54, SD 13.5) years, and a majority were female (123/140, 87.9%) and White (126/140, 90%). Our findings show that the behavior of accessing any online community was significantly associated with participants' belief in the value of online peer support (P=.006). Moreover, of the 40 non-online community caregivers, 33 (83%) had a belief score above 24-the score that was assigned when a neutral option was selected for each belief question. The most common reasons for not accessing any online community were having no time to do so (14/140, 10%) and having insufficient online information-searching skills (9/140, 6.4%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that online peer support is valuable, but practical strategies are needed to assist informal dementia caregivers who have limited time or online information-searching skills.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultAgedFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescaregiving challengesinformal dementia caregiveronline health communityonline peer supportsocial supportsurvey

Identifiers

PMID38825836
PMCPMC11185190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.