ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2024
Development of
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- pH responsive nanoplatforms for radiosensitization and radioprotection in cancer therapy.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Folate Receptor Alpha Targeted Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography Probe for Noninvasive Imaging in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- Strategic Objectives of Nanotechnology-Driven Repurposing in Radiopharmacy-Implications for Radiopharmaceutical Repurposing (Beyond Oncology).Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Mannosamine-Modified Poly(lactic-Bioconjugate chemistry · 2025Article
- Applications of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9-Related Nanomedicines in Tumors and Vascular Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- An overview of the role of radionuclides in targeted cancer treatment: application of biomarkers for patient selection and developments to improve treatment efficacy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Current landscape and future directions of targeted-alpha-therapy for glioblastoma treatment.Theranostics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted alpha therapy (TAT) relies on chemical affinity or active targeting using radioimmunoconjugates as strategies to deliver α-emitting radionuclides to cancerous tissue. These strategies can be affected by transmetalation of the parent radionuclide by competing ions in vivo and the bond-breaking recoil energy of decay daughters. The retention of α-emitting radionuclides and the dose delivered to cancer cells are influenced by these processes. Encapsulating α-emitting radionuclides within nanoparticles can help overcome many of these challenges. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles are a biodegradable and biocompatible delivery platform that has been used for drug delivery. In this study, PLGA nanoparticles are utilized for encapsulation and retention of actinium-225 ([
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.