Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38825710›Full record

ReviewEcho research and practice2024

The assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: guidance and recommendations from the British Society of Echocardiography.

Shaun Robinson, Liam Ring, David Oxborough, Allan Harkness, Sadie Bennett, Bushra Rana, Nilesh Sutaria, Francesco Lo Giudice, Matthew Shun-Shin, Maria Paton and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Echo research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07263282 (Left Atrium Strain as a Predictor of In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07263282 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Left Atrium Strain as a Predictor of In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled135ConditionsST Elevation (STEMI) Myocardial InfarctionArms2D echocardiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shaun RobinsonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. shaunrobinson@nhs.net.
Liam RingWest Suffolk Hospital NHS Trust, Bury St Edmunds, UK.
David OxboroughLiverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, UK.
Allan HarknessEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK.
Sadie BennettUniversity Hospital of the North Midlands, Stoke-On-Trent, UK.
Bushra RanaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nilesh SutariaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Francesco Lo GiudiceImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Matthew Shun-ShinImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Maria PatonLeeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Rae DuncanNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
James WillisRoyal United Hospital Bath, Bath, UK.
Claire ColebournOxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Gemma BassindaleLeeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Kate GatenbyLeeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Mark BelhamAddenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
Graham ColeImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Daniel AugustineRoyal United Hospital Bath, Bath, UK.
Otto A SmisethDivision of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is common amongst those with left heart disease and is associated with significant morbidity. Given that, in simple terms, the ventricle can only eject the volume with which it fills and that approximately one half of hospitalisations for heart failure (HF) are in those with normal/'preserved' left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (Bianco et al. in JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 13:258-271, 2020. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.035), where abnormalities of ventricular filling are the cause of symptoms, it is clear that the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function (LVDF) is crucial for understanding global cardiac function and for identifying the wider effects of disease processes. Invasive methods of measuring LV relaxation and filling pressures are considered the gold-standard for investigating diastolic function. However, the high temporal resolution of trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) with widely validated and reproducible measures available at the patient's bedside and without the need for invasive procedures involving ionising radiation have established echocardiography as the primary imaging modality. The comprehensive assessment of LVDF is therefore a fundamental element of the standard TTE (Robinson et al. in Echo Res Pract7:G59-G93, 2020. 10.1530/ERP-20-0026). However, the echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is complex. In the broadest and most basic terms, ventricular diastole comprises an early filling phase when blood is drawn, by suction, into the ventricle as it rapidly recoils and lengthens following the preceding systolic contraction and shortening. This is followed in late diastole by distension of the compliant LV when atrial contraction actively contributes to ventricular filling. When LVDF is normal, ventricular filling is achieved at low pressure both at rest and during exertion. However, this basic description merely summarises the complex physiology that enables the diastolic process and defines it according to the mechanical method by which the ventricles fill, overlooking the myocardial function, properties of chamber compliance and pressure differentials that determine the capacity for LV filling. Unlike ventricular systolic function where single parameters are utilised to define myocardial performance (LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)), the assessment of diastolic function relies on the interpretation of multiple myocardial and blood-flow velocity parameters, along with left atrial (LA) size and function, in order to diagnose the presence and degree of impairment. The echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is therefore multifaceted and complex, requiring an algorithmic approach that incorporates parameters of myocardial relaxation/recoil, chamber compliance and function under variable loading conditions and the intra-cavity pressures under which these processes occur. This guideline outlines a structured approach to the assessment of diastolic function and includes recommendations for the assessment of LV relaxation and filling pressures. Non-routine echocardiographic measures are described alongside guidance for application in specific circumstances. Provocative methods for revealing increased filling pressure on exertion are described and novel and emerging modalities considered. For rapid access to the core recommendations of the diastolic guideline, a quick-reference guide (additional file 1) accompanies the main guideline document. This describes in very brief detail the diastolic investigation in each patient group and includes all algorithms and core reference tables.

Indexed as

Diastolic functionFilling pressuresHFpEFLeft atrial pressure

Identifiers

PMID38825710
PMCPMC11145885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.