Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38825588›Full record

ArticleClinical rehabilitation2024

The perceptions of nurses and physicians in primary care of rehabilitation for frail older adults.

Maria Laitalainen Törnudd, Anneli Peolsson, Maria M Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Laitalainen TörnuddDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anneli PeolssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-4432
Maria M JohanssonDepartment of Activity and Health, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4166-7269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the perceptions of primary care nurses and physicians of the potential contributions of physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) in the treatment of frail older persons, as well as the obstacles to, and opportunities for, collaboration.

designA qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingNurses (n = 9) and physicians (n = 8) in primary care in the county council [14 women (82%)] with experience working with older people.

methodInterview study conducted with a semi-structured interview guide. Analyses were carried out with content analysis with an inductive approach.

resultsThe analysis resulted in six categories: knowledge of physiotherapy and occupational therapy interventions; what triggers the need for physiotherapy and occupational therapy?; the availability of rehabilitation interventions; teamwork opportunities and difficulties; motivating the patient; the site of the rehabilitation.

conclusionsClose and clear collaboration between nurses and physicians and PTs and OTs is an important factor in ensuring that rehabilitation interventions provide the greatest possible benefit to the patient. Improving communication between different healthcare providers and clarifying the contact routes is a prerequisite for patients to be able to get the rehabilitation they need. More research is needed to determine the best approach to achieving this goal.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFrail ElderlyPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNursesOccupational TherapistsPhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesFrail elderlyoccupational therapypatient care teamphysical therapy specialtyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38825588
PMCPMC11468118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.