ArticleMedical image analysis2024
Comparing regularized Kelvinlet functions and the finite element method for registration of medical images to sparse organ data.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PCReg: a coarse-to-fine registration framework using point cloud completion for intraoperative liver deformation correction.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Boundary Constraint-Free Biomechanical Model-Based Surface Matching for Intraoperative Liver Deformation Correction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Deformable Mapping of Rectal Cancer Whole-Mount Histology with Restaging MRI at Voxel Scale: A Feasibility Study.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2024Article
- The Image-to-Physical Liver Registration Sparse Data Challenge: comparison of state-of-the-art using a common dataset.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Image-guided surgery collocates patient-specific data with the physical environment to facilitate surgical decision making. Unfortunately, these guidance systems commonly become compromised by intraoperative soft-tissue deformations. Nonrigid image-to-physical registration methods have been proposed to compensate for deformations, but clinical utility requires compatibility of these techniques with data sparsity and temporal constraints in the operating room. While finite element models can be effective in sparse data scenarios, computation time remains a limitation to widespread deployment. This paper proposes a registration algorithm that uses regularized Kelvinlets, which are analytical solutions to linear elasticity in an infinite domain, to overcome these barriers. This algorithm is demonstrated and compared to finite element-based registration on two datasets: a phantom liver deformation dataset and an in vivo breast deformation dataset. The regularized Kelvinlets algorithm resulted in a significant reduction in computation time compared to the finite element method. Accuracy as evaluated by target registration error was comparable between methods. Average target registration errors were 4.6 ± 1.0 and 3.2 ± 0.8 mm on the liver dataset and 5.4 ± 1.4 and 6.4 ± 1.5 mm on the breast dataset for the regularized Kelvinlets and finite element method, respectively. Limitations of regularized Kelvinlets include the lack of organ-specific geometry and the assumptions of linear elasticity and infinitesimal strain. Despite limitations, this work demonstrates the generalizability of regularized Kelvinlets registration on two soft-tissue elastic organs. This method may improve and accelerate registration for image-guided surgery, and it shows the potential of using regularized Kelvinlets on medical imaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.