ArticleProteomics2024
A complementary metaproteomic approach to interrogate microbiome cultivated from clinical colon biopsies.
Article in Proteomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Miniature bioreactor arrays for modeling functional and structural dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Comparing and optimizing protein extraction methods with different lysis buffers for the analyses of human fecal microbiome via metaproteomics approach.Journal of microbiological methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human gut microbiome plays a vital role in preserving individual health and is intricately involved in essential functions. Imbalances or dysbiosis within the microbiome can significantly impact human health and are associated with many diseases. Several metaproteomics platforms are currently available to study microbial proteins within complex microbial communities. In this study, we attempted to develop an integrated pipeline to provide deeper insights into both the taxonomic and functional aspects of the cultivated human gut microbiomes derived from clinical colon biopsies. We combined a rapid peptide search by MSFragger against the Unified Human Gastrointestinal Protein database and the taxonomic and functional analyses with Unipept Desktop and MetaLab-MAG. Across seven samples, we identified and matched nearly 36,000 unique peptides to approximately 300 species and 11 phyla. Unipept Desktop provided gene ontology, InterPro entries, and enzyme commission number annotations, facilitating the identification of relevant metabolic pathways. MetaLab-MAG contributed functional annotations through Clusters of Orthologous Genes and Non-supervised Orthologous Groups categories. These results unveiled functional similarities and differences among the samples. This integrated pipeline holds the potential to provide deeper insights into the taxonomy and functions of the human gut microbiome for interrogating the intricate connections between microbiome balance and diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.