Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38824623›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2024

Adherence, health care utilization, and costs between long-acting injectable and oral antipsychotic medications in South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.

Chao Cai, Chris Kozma, Charmi Patel, Carmela Benson, Ismaeel Yunusa, Pujing Zhao, Gene Reeder, Meera Narasimhan, Robert L Bank

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Automatic activation of neurostimulation for central sleep apnea results in high nightly usage.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chao CaiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy.
Chris KozmaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy.
Charmi PatelUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Titusville, NJ.
Carmela BensonUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Titusville, NJ.
Ismaeel YunusaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy.
Pujing ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy.
Gene ReederDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy.
Meera NarasimhanNeuropsychiatry and Behavioral Science, School of Medicine.
Robert L BankSouth Carolina Department of Mental Health, Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder require long-term antipsychotic treatment with antipsychotic medications, but poor medication adherence can lead to increased health care utilization and costs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer potential therapeutic advantages in that they require less frequent dosing and improved medication adherence. South Carolina has the highest adoption of LAIs among US states, making it an ideal population for comparing the effectiveness of LAIs vs oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of LAIs compared with OAPs on medication adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

methodsSouth Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 1 claim for an LAI or OAP between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, aged 18 to 65, with at least 2 claims with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for confounders and predictors of the outcome. We estimated the "average treatment effect on the treated" by employing PS-weighted t-tests and chi-square tests.

resultsA total of 3,531 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,537 (44.5%) treated with LAIs and 1,994 (56.5%) treated with OAPs. In PS-weighted analyses, the LAI cohort had a greater proportion of days covered than the OAP cohort with a 365-day fixed denominator (69% vs 64%;

conclusionsAmong South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries, treatment with LAIs for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was associated with greater medication adherence rates. Patients using LAIs had higher drug costs and total costs, but lower outpatient and total nondrug costs compared with those using OAPs.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug MonitoringMedicaidPatient Acceptance of Health CareSchizophreniaAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedAntipsychotic AgentsDelayed-Action Preparations

Identifiers

PMID38824623
PMCPMC11144998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.