Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38824608›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2024

High stress hyperglycemia ratio predicts adverse clinical outcome in patients with coronary three-vessel disease: a large-scale cohort study.

Zheng Qiao, Xiaohui Bian, Chenxi Song, Rui Zhang, Sheng Yuan, Zhangyu Lin, Chenggang Zhu, Qianqian Liu, Wenjun Ma, Kefei Dou

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zheng Qiao *State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Xiaohui Bian *State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Chenxi SongState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Rui ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Sheng YuanState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Zhangyu LinState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Chenggang ZhuState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Qianqian LiuCardiometabolic Medicine Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 167A, Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Wenjun MaHypertension Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 167A, Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China. fuwaima@163.com.
Kefei DouState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China. drdoukefei@126.com.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2021-I2M-1-008National High Level Hospitalclinical Research Funding 2023-GSP-QN-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary three-vessel disease (CTVD) accounts for one-third of the overall incidence of coronary artery disease, with heightened mortality rates compared to single-vessel lesions, including common trunk lesions. Dysregulated glucose metabolism exacerbates atherosclerosis and increases cardiovascular risk. The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is proposed as an indicator of glucose metabolism status but its association with cardiovascular outcomes in CTVD patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.

methods10,532 CTVD patients undergoing PCI were consecutively enrolled. SHR was calculated using the formula: admission blood glucose (mmol/L)/[1.59×HbA1c (%)-2.59]. Patients were divided into two groups (SHR Low and SHR High) according to the optimal cutoff value of SHR. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the relationship between SHR and long-term prognosis. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular (CV) events, composing of cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI).

resultsDuring the median follow-up time of 3 years, a total of 279 cases (2.6%) of CV events were recorded. Multivariable Cox analyses showed that high SHR was associated with a significantly higher risk of CV events [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.99, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.58-2.52, P < 0.001). This association remained consistent in patients with (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.08-2.10, P = 0.016) and without diabetes (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.42-2.72, P < 0.001). Additionally, adding SHR to the base model of traditional risk factors led to a significant improvement in the C-index, net reclassification and integrated discrimination.

conclusionsSHR was a significant predictor for adverse CV outcomes in CTVD patients with or without diabetes, which suggested that it could aid in the risk stratification in this particular population regardless of glucose metabolism status.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood GlucoseCoronary Artery DiseaseHyperglycemiaPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanCoronary artery diseaseCoronary three-vessel diseasePrognosisStress hyperglycemia ratio

Identifiers

PMID38824608
PMCPMC11144339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.