Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38824531›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

Risk factor analysis and nomogram for predicting poor symptom control in smoking asthmatics.

Jinxin Ma, Ziheng Chen, Ke Wu, Jiahui Lei, Limin Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinxin MaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450003, People's Republic of China.
Ziheng ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450003, People's Republic of China.
Ke WuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, 550004, People's Republic of China.
Jiahui LeiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450003, People's Republic of China.
Limin ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People's Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450003, People's Republic of China. zhaolimin2002@126.com.

Funding

Joint Fund Project of Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Henan Province No. 222103810053National Natural Science Foundation of China No. U2004120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking induces and modifies the airway immune response, accelerating the decline of asthmatics' lung function and severely affecting asthma symptoms' control level. To assess the prognosis of asthmatics who smoke and to provide reasonable recommendations for treatment, we constructed a nomogram prediction model.

methodsGeneral and clinical data were collected from April to September 2021 from smoking asthmatics aged ≥14 years attending the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Patients were followed up regularly by telephone or outpatient visits, and their medication and follow-up visits were recorded during the 6-months follow-up visit, as well as their asthma control levels after 6 months (asthma control questionnaire-5, ACQ-5). The study employed R4.2.2 software to conduct univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors for 'poorly controlled asthma' (ACQ>0.75) as the outcome variable. Subsequently, a nomogram prediction model was constructed. Internal validation was used to test the reproducibility of the model. The model efficacy was evaluated using the consistency index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve.

resultsInvitations were sent to 231 asthmatics who smoked. A total of 202 participants responded, resulting in a final total of 190 participants included in the model development. The nomogram established five independent risk factors (P<0.05): FEV1%pred, smoking index (100), comorbidities situations, medication regimen, and good or poor medication adherence. The area under curve (AUC) of the modeling set was 0.824(95%CI 0.765-0.884), suggesting that the nomogram has a high ability to distinguish poor asthma control in smoking asthmatics after 6 months. The calibration curve showed a C-index of 0.824 for the modeling set and a C-index of 0.792 for the self-validation set formed by 1000 bootstrap sampling, which means that the prediction probability of the model was consistent with reality. Decision curve analysis (DCA) of the nomogram revealed that the net benefit was higher when the risk threshold probability for poor asthma control was 4.5 - 93.9%.

conclusionsFEV1%pred, smoking index (100), comorbidities situations, medication regimen, and medication adherence were identified as independent risk factors for poor asthma control after 6 months in smoking asthmatics. The nomogram established based on these findings can effectively predict relevant risk and provide clinicians with a reference to identify the poorly controlled population with smoking asthma as early as possible, and to select a better therapeutic regimen. Meanwhile, it can effectively improve the medication adherence and the degree of attention to complications in smoking asthma patients.

Indexed as

AsthmaNomogramsSmokingAdultChinaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsROC CurveSurveys and QuestionnairesAsthmaControl levelNomogramPrognosisSmoking

Identifiers

PMID38824531
PMCPMC11144325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.