ArticleBMC cancer2024
Development and validation of a preoperative CT‑based radiomics nomogram to differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas: an external validation study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A methodological framework for integrating generalisable deep learning and radiomics fusion model for early lung cancer detection across multi-centre imaging datasets.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Development and validation of machine learning diagnostic models integrating clinical, CT, and laboratory features to differentiate lung cancer from pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules: a single-center retrospective study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a habitat-based computed tomography radiomics model for differentiating isolated lung cancer, isolated tuberculoma, and coexistence of tuberculosis with lung cancer: a dual-center retrospective study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- CT-based radiomics and intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting benign and malignant lesions in solid pulmonary nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Disseminated Tuberculosis Masquerading as Malignancy in an Immunocompetent Middle-aged Woman: A Multiorgan Imaging Case Report and Updated Review for CliniciansCurrent medical imaging · 2026Review
- Differentiation of pulmonary tuberculosis from non-tuberculous solid lung lesions using radiomics and clinical-semantic features on contrast-enhanced CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Intranodular and perinodular radiomics features based on non-contrast CT to distinguish pulmonary cryptococcosis from lung adenocarcinoma: a two-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Whole-lung computed tomography radiomics combined with clinical features for differentiating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis from drug-sensitive tuberculosis: a retrospective multi-center study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Differentiating Lung Adenocarcinoma from Tuberculous Nodules in HIV/AIDS Patients Using Preoperative CT-Based Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics Combined with Clinical Features.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn accurate and non-invasive approach is urgently needed to distinguish tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on contrast enhanced-compute tomography (CE-CT) to preoperatively differentiate tuberculosis granuloma from lung adenocarcinoma appearing as solitary pulmonary solid nodules (SPSN).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 143 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (mean age: 62.4 ± 6.5 years; 54.5% female) and 137 patients with tuberculosis granulomas (mean age: 54.7 ± 8.2 years; 29.2% female) from two centers between March 2015 and June 2020. The training and internal validation cohorts included 161 and 69 patients (7:3 ratio) from center No.1, respectively. The external testing cohort included 50 patients from center No.2. Clinical factors and conventional radiological characteristics were analyzed to build independent predictors. Radiomics features were extracted from each CT-volume of interest (VOI). Feature selection was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, as well as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. A clinical model was constructed with clinical factors and radiological findings. Individualized radiomics nomograms incorporating clinical data and radiomics signature were established to validate the clinical usefulness. The diagnostic performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsOne clinical factor (CA125), one radiological characteristic (enhanced-CT value) and nine radiomics features were found to be independent predictors, which were used to establish the radiomics nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated better diagnostic efficacy than any single model, with respective AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.903, 0.857, 0.901, and 0.807 in the training cohort; 0.933, 0.884, 0.893, and 0.892 in the internal validation cohort; 0.914, 0.800, 0.937, and 0.735 in the external test cohort. The calibration curve showed a good agreement between prediction probability and actual clinical findings.
conclusionThe nomogram incorporating clinical factors, radiological characteristics and radiomics signature provides additional value in distinguishing tuberculosis granuloma from lung adenocarcinoma in patients with a SPSN, potentially serving as a robust diagnostic strategy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.