ArticleDermatology and therapy2024
Intradermal Injection in Balding Region Versus Intramuscular Injection in Surrounding Muscles: A Split-Scalp, Randomized Trial on BoNT for Androgenetic Alopecia.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Who Tells the Story of the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia?-A Bibliometric Analysis From 2003 to 2023.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Hair and Scalp Disorders: Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.Toxins · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRecent advancements in androgenetic alopecia (AGA) treatment have highlighted the efficacy of botulinum toxin (BoNT). However, inconsistencies in injection sites and depths warrant attention. It remains unclear which injection strategy is most beneficial for patients.
methodsThis split-scalp randomized controlled trial divided each enrolled participant's scalp along the midline: one side was randomized to receive intramuscular BoNT injections in the surrounding muscles, while the other side received intradermal BoNT injections directly into the balding areas. This study evaluated the impact of treatment on hair density and diameter through trichoscopic examinations conducted at baseline and 12 weeks post treatment. Additionally, assessments of pain and overall safety were integrated into the study protocol.
resultsTwenty-nine patients completed the study, with significant improvements in hair density observed in the intramuscular injection group compared to the intradermal group (p < 0.001). Both groups exhibited increases in hair diameter, but no significant difference was found between the two methods (p = 0.433). Pain evaluation revealed that intradermal injections in balding areas were more painful than intramuscular injections (p = 0.036), with no severe adverse reactions reported except for a single case of alopecia areata following injection.
conclusionOur research revealed that both BoNT injection strategies enhanced hair diameter 12 weeks post-treatment, with intramuscular injections significantly improving hair density more effectively. Despite the promising outcomes, the variability in patient responses underscores the necessity for personalized approaches and further research to refine injection protocols for optimized efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400080190.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.