ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Aortic roadmapping during EVAR: a combined FEM-EM tracking feasibility study.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCurrently, the intra-operative visualization of vessels during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) relies on contrast-based imaging modalities. Moreover, traditional image fusion techniques lack a continuous and automatic update of the vessel configuration, which changes due to the insertion of stiff guidewires. The purpose of this work is to develop and evaluate a novel approach to improve image fusion, that takes into account the deformations, combining electromagnetic (EM) tracking technology and finite element modeling (FEM).
methodsTo assess whether EM tracking can improve the prediction of the numerical simulations, a patient-specific model of abdominal aorta was segmented and manufactured. A database of simulations with different insertion angles was created. Then, an ad hoc sensorized tool with three embedded EM sensors was designed, enabling tracking of the sensors' positions during the insertion phase. Finally, the corresponding cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were acquired and processed to obtain the ground truth aortic deformations of the manufactured model.
resultsAmong the simulations in the database, the one minimizing the in silico versus in vitro discrepancy in terms of sensors' positions gave the most accurate aortic displacement results.
conclusionsThe proposed approach suggests that the EM tracking technology could be used not only to follow the tool, but also to minimize the error in the predicted aortic roadmap, thus paving the way for a safer EVAR navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.