Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38824470›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Aortic roadmapping during EVAR: a combined FEM-EM tracking feasibility study.

Monica Emendi, Geir A Tangen, Pierluigi Di Giovanni, Håvard Ulsaker, Reidar Brekken, Frode Manstad-Hulaas, Victorien Prot, Aline Bel-Brunon, Karen H Støverud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monica EmendiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. monica.emendi@alumni.uniroma2.eu.
Geir A TangenDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Pierluigi Di GiovanniHSL, Trento, Italy.
Håvard UlsakerDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Reidar BrekkenDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Frode Manstad-HulaasDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Victorien ProtDepartment of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Aline Bel-BrunonINSA Lyon, CNRS, LaMCoS, UMR5259, Univ Lyon, 69621, Villeurbanne, France.
Karen H StøverudDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway. karen-helene.stoverud@sintef.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3939-1590

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions No 859836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrently, the intra-operative visualization of vessels during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) relies on contrast-based imaging modalities. Moreover, traditional image fusion techniques lack a continuous and automatic update of the vessel configuration, which changes due to the insertion of stiff guidewires. The purpose of this work is to develop and evaluate a novel approach to improve image fusion, that takes into account the deformations, combining electromagnetic (EM) tracking technology and finite element modeling (FEM).

methodsTo assess whether EM tracking can improve the prediction of the numerical simulations, a patient-specific model of abdominal aorta was segmented and manufactured. A database of simulations with different insertion angles was created. Then, an ad hoc sensorized tool with three embedded EM sensors was designed, enabling tracking of the sensors' positions during the insertion phase. Finally, the corresponding cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were acquired and processed to obtain the ground truth aortic deformations of the manufactured model.

resultsAmong the simulations in the database, the one minimizing the in silico versus in vitro discrepancy in terms of sensors' positions gave the most accurate aortic displacement results.

conclusionsThe proposed approach suggests that the EM tracking technology could be used not only to follow the tool, but also to minimize the error in the predicted aortic roadmap, thus paving the way for a safer EVAR navigation.

Indexed as

Aorta, AbdominalAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalEndovascular ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFinite Element AnalysisCone-Beam Computed TomographyElectromagnetic PhenomenaHumansSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdditive manufacturingAortic updated roadmapElectromagnetic trackingEVARFinite element methodVessel-tool interaction

Identifiers

PMID38824470
PMCPMC11541383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.