SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Management of paediatric fifth metacarpal neck fractures: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Fractures of the finger and metacarpal bones II-V : Diagnostics and treatment].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMCNFs) are common among paediatric patients. Complications include reduced metacarpophalangeal (MCP) range of motion and grip strength, which impede the hand's functional abilities. Various management options are available, but indications are not standardised. This systematic review aims to assimilate all available evidence on the management of paediatric FMCNFs to determine appropriate treatment pathways.
methodsPubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar were used to identify evidence pertaining to the management of these fractures.
resultsTen studies were identified, involving 237 patients with a mean age of 14.4 years (Range 9-17). Ninety percent of patients were male. Sixty-one (26%) patients, with an average fracture angulation of 27° (Range 16°-33°) and no rotational deformities, were managed with immobilisation alone. These patients returned to normal metacarpophalangeal range of motion and grip strength. Fifty-four (23%) patients, with an average fracture angulation of 42.7° (Range 33°-54°), were managed with fracture reduction and immobilisation. This technique did not yield sustained reduction of fractures with significant angulation or rotation after intervention. One hundred twenty-two (51%) patients, with an average fracture angulation of 48.3° (Range 30°-58°) and including cases of malrotation, were managed with fracture reduction and surgical fixation. These patients experienced good functional outcomes.
conclusionsThis review suggests paediatric FMCNFs can be safely managed with immobilisation alone when there is an absence of rotational deformity and an angulation of < 30°. In the case of a higher fracture angulation or rotational deformity, fracture reduction and surgical fixation is an appropriate method of management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38824459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.