Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38824449›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Personalized ctDNA for Monitoring Disease Status in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Glenn J Hanna, Michael J Dennis, Nicole Scarfo, Michelle S Mullin, Rosh K V Sethi, Kartik Sehgal, Donald J Annino, Laura A Goguen, Robert I Haddad, Roy B Tishler and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Revisiting tumor immunogenicity through the lens of mutant p53: Implications for cancer immunotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Postoperative Lymph Is a Proximal Source of ctDNA for Detection of Recurrence in HPV-Independent Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Immune biomarkers for head and neck cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Glenn J HannaCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9969-2523
Michael J DennisCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8175-5311
Nicole ScarfoCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0003-9512-1015
Michelle S MullinCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0004-0038-1963
Rosh K V SethiCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-1508-1363
Kartik SehgalCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-6943
Donald J AnninoCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0525-0263
Laura A GoguenCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-8335-8566
Robert I HaddadCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-1413-0079
Roy B TishlerCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0012-6055
Danielle N MargalitCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8281-0829
Ravindra UppaluriCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-6828
Jonathan D SchoenfeldCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-5119-0401
Eleni M RettigCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4715-0087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany patients with locoregionally advanced human papillomavirus-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) relapse. ctDNA has the potential to identify minimal residual disease, but its clinical utility for virus-negative HNSCC is not well understood. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe retrospectively evaluated a personalized, commercial ctDNA assay (Signatera, Natera) during clinical care of patients treated for predominantly newly diagnosed human papillomavirus-negative HNSCC. Signatera utilizes 16-plex PCR from matched tumor and blood. Objectives were to understand ctDNA detectability and correlate changes posttreatment with disease outcomes.

resultsTesting was successful in 100/116 (86%) patients (median age: 65 years, 68% male, 65% smokers); testing failed in 16 (14%) because of insufficient tissue. Oral cavity (55, 47%) tumors were most common; most had stage III to IV disease (82, 71%), whereas 17 (15%) had distant metastases. Pretreatment, 75/100 patients with successful testing (75%) had detectable ctDNA (range: 0.03-4049.69 mean tumor molecules/mL). No clinical features predicted ctDNA detectability or levels (multivariate analysis). At a median follow-up of 5.1 months (range: 0.2-15.1), 55 (55%) had >1 test result (range: 1-7; 194 samples). Of 55 patients, 17 (31%) remained ctDNA positive after starting treatment. Progression-free survival was significantly worse for patients who were ctDNA positive versus ctDNA negative posttreatment (HR, 7.33; 95% confidence interval, 3.12-17.2; P < 0.001); 1-year overall survival was 89.1% versus 100%, respectively (HR, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-119.5; P = 0.155).

conclusionsTumor-informed ctDNA testing is feasible in nonviral HNSCC. ctDNA positivity is an indicator of disease progression and associated with inferior survival. Further research is warranted to understand whether ctDNA may be leveraged to guide therapy in HNSCC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAHead and Neck NeoplasmsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPolymerase Chain ReactionPrecision MedicinePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID38824449
PMCPMC11292193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.