ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Analysis of population structure and genetic diversity of Camellia tachangensis in Guizhou based on SNP markers.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome wide association analysis of flavour related metabolites in tea germplasm [Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze] from Assam using a genotyping by sequencing strategy.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Assembly and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of an endemic Camellia species of China, Camellia tachangensis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity analysis and core germplasm construction of tea plants in Lu'an.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCamellia tachangensis F. C. Zhang is a five-compartment species in the ovary of tea group plants, which represents the original germline of early differentiation of some tea group plants. METHODS AND
resultsIn this study, we analyzed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the genome level, constructed a phylogenetic tree, analyzed the genetic diversity, and further investigated the population structure of 100 C. tachangensis accessions using the genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) method. A total of 91,959 high-quality SNPs were obtained. Population structure analysis showed that the 100 C. tachangensis accessions clustered into three groups: YQ-1 (Village Group), YQ-2 (Forest Group) and YQ-3 (Transition Group), which was further consistent with the results of phylogenetic analysis and principal component analyses (PCA). In addition, a comparative analysis of the genetic diversity among the three populations (Forest, Village, and Transition Groups) detected the highest genetic diversity in the Transition Group and the highest differentiation between Forest and Village Groups.
conclusionsC. tachangensis plants growing in the forest had different genetic backgrounds from those growing in villages. This study provides a basis for the effective protection and utilization of C. tachangensis populations and lays a foundation for future C. tachangensis breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.