ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Microinjection of the CRISPR/Cas9 editing system through the germ pore of a wheat microspore induces mutations in the target Ms2 gene.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acidic pH Condition Enhances Femtosecond Laser Photoinjection of Plasmid DNA into Intact Tobacco BY‑2.ACS omega · 2025Article
- CRISPR-Cas Systems: A Functional Perspective and Innovations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advancements in plant transformation: from traditional methods to cutting-edge techniques and emerging model species.Plant cell reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicroinjection is a direct procedure for delivering various compounds via micropipette into individual cells. Combined with the CRISPR/Cas9 editing technology, it has been used to produce genetically engineered animal cells. However, genetic micromanipulation of intact plant cells has been a relatively unexplored area of research, partly due to the cytological characteristics of these cells. This study aimed to gain insight into the genetic micromanipulation of wheat microspores using microinjection procedures combined with the CRISPR/Cas9 editing system targeting the Ms2 gene. METHODS AND
resultsMicrospores were first reprogrammed by starvation and heat shock treatment to make them structurally suitable for microinjection. The large central vacuole was fragmented and the nucleus with cytoplasm was positioned in the center of the cell. This step and an additional maltose gradient provided an adequate source of intact single cells in the three wheat genotypes. The microcapillary was inserted into the cell through the germ pore to deliver a working solution with a fluorescent marker. This procedure was much more efficient and less harmful to the microspore than inserting the microcapillary through the cell wall. The CRISPR/Cas9 binary vectors injected into reprogrammed microspores induced mutations in the target Ms2 gene with deletions ranging from 1 to 16 bp.
conclusionsThis is the first report of successful genome editing in an intact microspore/wheat cell using the microinjection technique and the CRISPR/Cas9 editing system. The study presented offers a range of molecular and cellular biology tools that can aid in genetic micromanipulation and single-cell analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38824203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.