ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024
Towards automatic home-based sleep apnea estimation using deep learning.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of AI-Based Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across Apnea-Hypopnea Index Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Agreement between automated and manual scoring of level 3 home sleep apnea devices: A single-center retrospective study.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- SApneaNet: Adaptive Squeeze-and-Excitation-Based CNN-Transformer Network with AGFF for Sleep Apnea Event Detection Using ECG Images Under IoMT.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multifaceted approach for obstructive sleep apnea classification from ECG signal using deep learning.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Disease, Sleep-Disordered Breathing, and Artificial Intelligence: From Neutral Trials to Precision Sleep Cardiology.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Non-contact on-device detection of obstructive sleep apnea from infrared video.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for sleep-disordered breathing: a taxonomy of methods, data modalities, and clinical applications.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Review
- Multimodal physiological signal learning for clinical sleep respiratory event recognition.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- A Dual-Modal Wearable Pulse Detection System Integrated with Deep Learning for High-Accuracy and Low-Power Sleep Apnea Monitoring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Detection and Severity Classification of Sleep Apnea Using Continuous Wearable SpOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Non-obtrusive monitoring of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome based on ballistocardiography: a preliminary study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Apnea and hypopnea are common sleep disorders characterized by the obstruction of the airways. Polysomnography (PSG) is a sleep study typically used to compute the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), the number of times a person has apnea or certain types of hypopnea per hour of sleep, and diagnose the severity of the sleep disorder. Early detection and treatment of apnea can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. However, long-term PSG monitoring is unfeasible as it is costly and uncomfortable for patients. To address these issues, we propose a method, named DRIVEN, to estimate AHI at home from wearable devices and detect when apnea, hypopnea, and periods of wakefulness occur throughout the night. The method can therefore assist physicians in diagnosing the severity of apneas. Patients can wear a single sensor or a combination of sensors that can be easily measured at home: abdominal movement, thoracic movement, or pulse oximetry. For example, using only two sensors, DRIVEN correctly classifies 72.4% of all test patients into one of the four AHI classes, with 99.3% either correctly classified or placed one class away from the true one. This is a reasonable trade-off between the model's performance and the patient's comfort. We use publicly available data from three large sleep studies with a total of 14,370 recordings. DRIVEN consists of a combination of deep convolutional neural networks and a light-gradient-boost machine for classification. It can be implemented for automatic estimation of AHI in unsupervised long-term home monitoring systems, reducing costs to healthcare systems and improving patient care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.