Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38823786›Full record

ArticleJornal de pediatria

Patients with genital ambiguity referred without a sex definition: the relationship between clinical picture and defined sex of rearing.

Henrique C Santos, Beatriz A Barros, Mayra S El-Beck, Marcio L Miranda, Mara S Guaragna, Helena Fabbri-Scallet, Taís N Mazzola, Tarsis P Vieira, Maricilda P Mello, Antonia P Marques-de-Faria and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Henrique C SantosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Beatriz A BarrosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Mayra S El-BeckUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Marcio L MirandaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Mara S GuaragnaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Helena Fabbri-ScalletUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Taís N MazzolaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Tarsis P VieiraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Maricilda P MelloUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Antonia P Marques-de-FariaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Andrea T Maciel-GuerraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Gil Guerra-JuniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e Hospital das Clínicas Universitárias, Grupo Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Determinação e Diferenciação do Sexo, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: gilguer@unicamp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt was to verify the association between the definition of sex of rearing and, clinical and cytogenetic features among patients with genital ambiguity referred without a sex assignment.

methodsThe sample consisted of 133 patients with genital ambiguity seen at a single reference service. These patients did not have a defined social sex at the first consultation and their etiological diagnosis was obtained during follow-up.

resultsA total of 133 cases were included, 74 of which were reared as males and 59 as females. No correlation was found between the year of birth and the year of the first consultation with the definition of sex of rearing. However, the definition of sex of rearing was associated with age at the first consultation, severity of genital ambiguity, presence of palpable gonad(s), presence of uterus on ultrasound, karyotype, and diagnosis. Palpable gonad(s), more virilized genitalia, absence of a uterus on ultrasound, 46, XY karyotype, or a karyotype with sex chromosome abnormalities emerged as strong predictors for defining male sex. All 77 (58 %) patients over 18 years old had a gender identity in accordance with the sex of rearing; though 9 of 77 (12 %) had homo or bisexual orientation, especially girls with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.

conclusionsClinical and cytogenetic data were strongly associated with the definition of the sex of rearing of children with genital ambiguity referred to a DSD center without sex assignment. Management in a specialized center allows the establishment of a gender identity in accordance with the sex of rearing.

Indexed as

Disorders of Sex DevelopmentAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGender IdentityHumansInfantKaryotypingMaleEtiologyGenital ambiguityKaryotypeSexSex of rearing

Identifiers

PMID38823786
PMCPMC11662739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.