Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38823689›Full record

ReviewVirus research2024

Circulating rotavirus strains in children with acute gastroenteritis in Iran, 1986 to 2023 and their genetic/antigenic divergence compared to approved vaccines strains (Rotarix, RotaTeq, ROTAVAC, ROTASIIL) before mass vaccination: Clues for vaccination policy makers.

Somayeh Jalilvand, Tayebeh Latifi, Atefeh Kachooei, Mahtab Mirhoseinian, Somayeh-Sadat Hoseini-Fakhr, Farzane Behnezhad, Farzin Roohvand, Zabihollah Shoja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virus research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diverse processes in rotavirus vaccine development.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Somayeh JalilvandDepartment of Virology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tayebeh LatifiDepartment of Virology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Virology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Atefeh KachooeiDepartment of Virology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahtab MirhoseinianDepartment of Virology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Somayeh-Sadat Hoseini-FakhrDepartment of Virology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzane BehnezhadDepartment of Virology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzin RoohvandDepartment of Virology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Zabihollah ShojaDepartment of Virology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran; Research Center for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: zshoja@alumnus.tums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, first, rotaviruses that caused acute gastroenteritis in children under five years of age during the time before the vaccine was introduced in Iran (1986 to 2023) are reviewed. Subsequently, the antigenic epitopes of the VP7 and VP4/VP8 proteins in circulating rotavirus strains in Iran and that of the vaccine strains were compared and their genetic differences in histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs) and the potential impact on rotavirus infection susceptibility and vaccine efficacy were discussed. Overall data indicate that rotavirus was estimated in about 38.1 % of samples tested. The most common genotypes or combinations were G1 and P[8], or G1P[8]. From 2015 to 2023, there was a decline in the prevalence of G1P[8], with intermittent peaks of genotypes G3P[8] and G9P[8]. The analyses suggested that the monovalent Rotarix vaccine or monovalent vaccines containing the G1P[8] component might be proper in areas with a similar rotavirus genotype pattern and genetic background as the Iranian population where the G1P[8] strain is the most predominant and has the ability to bind to HBGA secretors. While the same concept can be applied to RotaTeq and RotasIIL vaccines, their complex vaccine technology, which involves reassortment, makes them less of a priority. The ROTASIIL vaccine, despite not having the VP4 arm (P[5]) as a suitable protection option, has previously shown the ability to neutralize not only G9-lineage I strains but also other G9-lineages at high titers. Thus, vaccination with the ROTASIIL vaccine may be more effective in Iran compared to RotaTeq. However, considering the rotavirus genotypic pattern, ROTAVAC might not be a good choice for Iran. Overall, the findings of this study provide valuable insights into the prevalence of rotavirus strains and the potential effectiveness of different vaccines in the Iranian and similar populations.

Indexed as

GastroenteritisGenotypeRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesAntigenic VariationAntigens, ViralChild, PreschoolHumansInfantIranMass VaccinationPhylogenyVaccines, AttenuatedAntigens, ViralRIX4414 vaccineRotaTeqRotavirus VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedGenotypelineageRotavirusVaccineVP4VP7

Identifiers

PMID38823689
PMCPMC11190746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.