Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38823673›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2024

Predicting Glaucoma Before Onset Using a Large Language Model Chatbot.

Xiaoqin Huang, Hina Raja, Yeganeh Madadi, Mohammad Delsoz, Asma Poursoroush, Malik Y Kahook, Siamak Yousefi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Table-based language models for ophthalmology assessment in the emergency department.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoqin HuangHamilton Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (X.H., H.R., Y.M., M.D., S.Y.), Memphis, Tennessee.
Hina RajaHamilton Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (X.H., H.R., Y.M., M.D., S.Y.), Memphis, Tennessee.
Yeganeh MadadiHamilton Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (X.H., H.R., Y.M., M.D., S.Y.), Memphis, Tennessee.
Mohammad DelsozHamilton Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (X.H., H.R., Y.M., M.D., S.Y.), Memphis, Tennessee.
Asma PoursoroushDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis and University of Tennessee Health Science Center (A.P.), Memphis, Tennessee.
Malik Y KahookDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine (M.Y.K.), Aurora, Colorado.
Siamak YousefiHamilton Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (X.H., H.R., Y.M., M.D., S.Y.), Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Genetics, Genomics, and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (S.Y.), Memphis, Tennessee, USA. Electronic address: Siamak.Yousefi@uthsc.edu.

Funding

Predicting the risk of glaucoma from structural, functional, and genetic factors using artificial intelligenceR01EY033005 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI YOUSEFI, SIAMAK · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the capability of ChatGPT for forecasting the conversion from ocular hypertension (OHT) to glaucoma based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).

designRetrospective case-control study.

participantsA total of 3008 eyes of 1504 subjects from the OHTS were included in the study.

methodsWe selected demographic, clinical, ocular, optic nerve head, and visual field (VF) parameters 1 year before glaucoma development from the OHTS participants. Subsequently, we developed queries by converting tabular parameters into textual format based on both eyes of all participants. We used the ChatGPT application program interface (API) to automatically perform ChatGPT prompting for all subjects. We then investigated whether ChatGPT can accurately forecast conversion from OHT to glaucoma based on various objective metrics.

main outcome measureAccuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and weighted F1 score.

resultsChatGPT4.0 demonstrated an accuracy of 75%, AUC of 0.67, sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 78%, and weighted F1 score of 0.77 in predicting conversion to glaucoma 1 year before onset. ChatGPT3.5 provided an accuracy of 61%, AUC of 0.62, sensitivity of 64%, specificity of 59%, and weighted F1 score of 0.63 in predicting conversion to glaucoma 1 year before onset.

conclusionsThe performance of ChatGPT4.0 in forecasting development of glaucoma 1 year before onset was reasonable. The overall performance of ChatGPT4.0 was consistently higher than ChatGPT3.5. Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for augmenting glaucoma research capabilities and enhancing clinical care. Future efforts in creating ophthalmology-specific LLMs that leverage multimodal data in combination with active learning may lead to more useful integration with clinical practice and deserve further investigations.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureROC CurveVisual FieldsAgedArea Under CurveCase-Control StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleGlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOcular HypertensionOptic DiskRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38823673
PMCPMC11402578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.