ArticleAcademic pediatrics
The Associations between Neighborhood Characteristics and Childhood Overweight and Obesity in a National Dataset.
Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neighborhood-Level Variation in the Effectiveness of Intensive Health Behavior and Lifestyle Treatment for Pediatric Obesity.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Changes in US Youth With Neighborhood Built Environment Supports for Physical Activity by Sociodemographic Characteristics, 2016-2017 to 2022-2023.Journal of physical activity & health · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Relationships Between Parental Support and Physical Activity Behavior among Hispanic Children with Overweight/Obesity.Hispanic journal of behavioral sciences · 2026Article
- Environmental Determinants of Pediatric Obesity: An Epidemiological Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Psychosocial Correlates of Childhood Body Mass Index: Racial and Ethnic Differences.Global journal of cardiovascular diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNational child obesity rates continue to climb. While neighborhood factors are known to influence childhood weight, more work is needed to further our understanding of these relationships and inform intervention and policy approaches reflective of complex real-world contexts.
methodsTo evaluate the associations between neighborhood components and childhood overweight/obesity, we analyzed sequential, cross-sectional data from the National Survey of Children's Health collected annually between 2016 and 2021. To characterize the complexity of children's neighborhood environments, several interrelated neighborhood factors were examined: amenities, detractions, support, and safety. We used ordinal logistic regression models to evaluate the associations between these exposures of interest and childhood weight status, adjusting for potential confounders.
resultsOur analytic sample contained 96,858 children representing a weighted population of 28,228,799 children ages 10-17 years. Child weight status was healthy in 66.5%, overweight in 16.8%, and obese in 17.2%. All four neighborhood factors were associated with child weight status. The odds of overweight or obesity generally increased with a decreasing number of amenities and increasing number of detractions, with the highest adjusted odds ratio seen with no amenities and all three possible detractions (1.71; 95% confidence interval [1.31, 2.11]).
conclusionsMultiple factors within a child's neighborhood environment were associated with child weight status in this sample representative of the US population aged 10-17 years. This suggests the need for future research into how policies and programs can support multiple components of a healthy neighborhood environment simultaneously to reduce rates of childhood overweight/obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.