ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2024
Pleiotropy, a feature or a bug? Toward co-ordinating plant growth, development, and environmental responses through engineering plant hormone signaling.
Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Stress Tolerance: From Stress Perception to Phytohormonal Crosstalk and Transcriptional Regulation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Genome editing of susceptibility geneFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The Enhancement of Fungal Disease Resistance in Major Staple Crops Using CRISPR-Cas Technology.Genes · 2025Review
- Pangenomic and Phenotypic Characterization of ColombianInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The switch-liker's guide to plant synthetic gene circuits.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of gene editing technologies such as CRISPR has simplified co-ordinating trait development. However, identifying candidate genes remains a challenge due to complex gene networks and pathways. These networks exhibit pleiotropy, complicating the determination of specific gene and pathway functions. In this review, we explore how systems biology and single-cell sequencing technologies can aid in identifying candidate genes for co-ordinating specifics of plant growth and development within specific temporal and tissue contexts. Exploring sequence-function space of these candidate genes and pathway modules with synthetic biology allows us to test hypotheses and define genotype-phenotype relationships through reductionist approaches. Collectively, these techniques hold the potential to advance breeding and genetic engineering strategies while also addressing genetic diversity issues critical for adaptation and trait development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.