SynthesisPituitary2024
Surgical treatment of cystic pituitary adenomas: literature-based definitions and postoperative outcomes.
Synthesis in Pituitary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pituitary macroadenoma: less common neuroimaging features in a common lesion.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesTo survey the applied definitions of 'cystic' among pituitary adenomas and evaluate whether postoperative outcomes differ relative to non-cystic counterparts.
methodsA literature search and meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Studies were eligible if novel data were reported regarding the applied definition of 'cystic' and postoperative outcomes among cases of surgically treated pituitary adenomas. Data were pooled with random effects meta-analysis models into cohorts based on the applied definition of 'cystic'. Categorical meta-regressions were used to investigate differences between cohorts. Among studies comparing cystic and non-cystic pituitary adenomas, meta-analysis models were applied to determine the Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval]. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA, 4.0), with a priori significance defined as P < 0.05.
resultsTen studies were eligible yielding 283 patients with cystic pituitary adenomas. The definitions of 'cystic' mainly varied between the visual appearance of cystic components on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and a volumetric definition requiring 50% or greater of tumor volume exhibiting cystic components. Tumor diameter was seldom reported with an associated standard deviation/error, limiting meta-analyses. When the data were pooled in accordance with the definition applied, there were no significant differences in the rates of gross total resection (P = 0.830), endocrinologic remission (P = 0.563), and tumor recurrence (P = 0.320). Meta-analyses on studies comparing cystic versus non-cystic pituitary adenomas indicated no significant difference in the rates of gross total resection (P = 0.729), endocrinologic remission (P = 0.857), and tumor recurrence (P = 0.465).
conclusionDespite some individual studies describing a significant influence of pituitary adenoma texture on postoperative outcomes, meta-analyses revealed no such differences between cystic and non-cystic pituitary adenomas. This discrepancy may be explained in part by the inconsistent definition of 'cystic' and between-group differences in tumor size. A notion of a field-standard definition of 'cystic' among pituitary adenomas should be established to facilitate inter-study comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38822983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.