ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2024
Establishment and validation of novel predictive models to predict bone metastasis in newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma based on single-photon emission computed tomography radiomics.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable radiomics-deep learning nomogram from whole-body bone scintigraphy for MDP-avid bone metastasis prediction in NSCLC.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models based on blood routine tests and tumor markers in early screening of primary bronchogenic lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish and validate novel predictive models for predicting bone metastasis (BM) in newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) via single-photon emission computed tomography radiomics.
methodIn a retrospective review of the clinical single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) database, 176 patients (training set: n = 140; validation set: n = 36) who underwent SPECT/CT imaging and were histologically confirmed to have newly diagnosed PCa from June 2016 to June 2022 were enrolled. Radiomic features were extracted from the region of interest (ROI) in a targeted lesion in each patient. Clinical features, including age, total prostate-specific antigen (t-PSA), and Gleason grades, were included. Statistical tests were then employed to eliminate irrelevant and redundant features. Finally, four types of optimized models were constructed for the prediction. Furthermore, fivefold cross-validation was applied to obtain sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) for performance evaluation. The clinical usefulness of the multivariate models was estimated through decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsA radiomics signature consisting of 27 selected features which were obtained by radiomics' LASSO treatment was significantly correlated with bone status (P < 0.01 for both training and validation sets). Collectively, the models showed good predictive efficiency. The AUC values ranged from 0.87 to 0.98 in four models. The AUC values of the human experts were 0.655 and 0.872 in the training and validation groups, respectively. Most radiomic models showed better diagnostic accuracy than human experts in the training and validation groups. DCA also demonstrated the superiority of the radiomics models compared to human experts.
conclusionRadiomics models are superior to humans in differentiating between benign bone and prostate cancer bone metastases; it can be used to facilitate personalized prediction of BM in newly diagnosed PCa patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38822897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.